Practice

Arbitration for Construction Disputes in India

Delay, variation and quality disputes dominate construction arbitration — and each needs a tribunal that understands the technical record, not just the contract.

Published
28 Sep 2026
Read time
1 min read
Seat
Chennai

Construction disputes typically turn on delay and extension of time, valuation of variations and change orders, defects and quality claims, and payment disputes tied to milestone certification — all of which require a tribunal comfortable reading programme schedules, site records and technical reports, not only the underlying contract.

Standard form contracts common in Indian infrastructure and construction work (FIDIC-based and domestic equivalents) typically already contain a multi-tier clause — engineer's determination or dispute board first, arbitration as the final binding stage — so parties should check what pre-conditions their specific contract imposes before filing.

Because the record in a construction dispute is often voluminous — drawings, RFIs, site diaries, correspondence — institutional administration that keeps a single authoritative file materially reduces the risk of disputes about what was actually submitted and when.

Want a topic covered, or a speaker for your in-house team?

Write to us